Depending on the time of year, San Lucas can be packed with volunteers. Right now is the “slow time” for volunteers so it’s just about 10 of us , those who will be here between 6 and 12 months. In December/January and June-August, the numbers might swell to around 150, most coming through for a week. I've included a number of pictures of my fellow volunteers and friends (as an excuse to share their wonderful faces)....they are great and this post is not referring to them.
There is much that can be commented on with regard to the role of volunteers in

this town but one thing that has struck me right from the start is the relationship between the volunteers, themselves.
The volunteers as a whole, one has to imagine, are a group of warm-hearted, concerned people who want to make the world a better, more equitable place. Everyone is working towards the common goal of improving the lives of people here in SLT. You would think that would mean that when you walked into the Parrochia for each of your meals, you would be greeted with hugs and enthusiastic moral support. That can be found amongst close friends but more evident, ironically, is judgment. This judgment is palpable and uncomfortable. It especially comes out whenever one begins to talk about the work s/he doing "in the field".
I can see where it comes from: people coming through with a huge amount of enthusiasm for starting new projects and infusing new ideas but not being able to stay long enough to respond to the enthusiasm and ideas of the locals (long enough meaning a life time, or just short of that). The great ideas go through a predictable pattern: incredible enthusiasm on arrival and lots of talk over mealtim

e about the plans, a few days of trying to get things off the runway usually met with locals saying “thanks” and “sounds like a great idea, this would really help us” but pointing out that money and supplies and logistical support will be needed (and this can only come from Parrochia or international benefactors), a few days of trying to conjur up Parrochial interest in the project usually met with very little interest because of the arguably correct assertion of the Parrochia that all projects need to be driven by and sustained by the local people, and a few days of disillusionment and upset just in time to get on the plane…hoping that back home the ideas might catch someone’s interest and generate some money that can be sent down (I’ve heard some locals point out that it might just be simpler to send the money at the start and save the plane fare). But, as I hear from volunteers

(long and short-term, alike), once back home, the rat race begins again and the urgency to solve problems here just isn’t there like it once was. And then, new volunteers come. (Oh, and long-termers seem to go through this same cycle, though the phases might be prolonged and the disillusionment phase seems to be followed by acquiescence, during which one just decides to "go with the flow" and follow the lead of those you are working with, maybe putting a little idea and inovation here and there. I haven't gotten passed that phase but think that there might be several more phases to follow, hopefully one of insight and the ability to truly move things "forward" a little bit without pushing agendas or creating dependency....though my even suggesting that volunteers might be able to "move things forward" sounds like the next phase may be a repeat of the aforementioned cycle).
The sad thing is that this cycle, and getting caught in it, doesn’t say anything bad about the person who is trying so hard to change the world, yet they often pay the price of a rather cold reception by other volunteers, especially longer-term volunteers. I think this depressing cycle is just the reality of a very, very hard problem (poverty and systematic, deliberate inequities) lacking easy solutions.
Even amongst the long-term volunteers, I feel like the judgment is palpable. Many people want to make sure that you are in your place and don’t fall victim to some illusion that you are actually helping very much. But rather realize that you, too, are in the cycle and when you leave if you are lucky you will have not caused any harm here. It seems like people feel their own legitimacy as a "do-gooder" is threatened and they must battle for the b

est “do-gooder” status. In a way, I understand that this judgment might serve a purpose. Maybe it’s not good for us all to feel we are doing something great here when we really could do better by going home and advocating for social change or sending money to support locally-driven programs (scholarships, teaching of skilled trade, elderly food programs, etc). But, because I myself wish the Parrocial volunteer circle could be a warmer, more supportive place, I have to believe that this ritual of judgment just isn’t necessary. I’m going to try to avoid being part of it, as best I can.